Shoes, Characters, and Stereotypes
You can thank Lisa Schroeder for putting today's topic in my head. Until I read her recent post on shoe shopping, and the comments on it, I thought I was the only woman in America who doesn't think that buying footwear is just the biggest thrill ever.
I am not a girly girl; I'm not stereotypically feminine. I don't think of shopping as recreation, I don't scream when I see a spider, and I never ask my husband if this dress makes me look fat (I don't wear dresses anyway, unless absolutely forced to). Sometimes stereotypes are thrown in our faces so repeatedly, it's easy to forget that there are huge numbers of people to whom they don't apply--even when we ourselves don't fit the mold. How else would I, of all people, have bought into the mindset that "women love to shoe shop" so I must just be some kind of aberrant freak?
And now, watch this deft transition as I explain what the heck my shopping habits (or lack thereof) have to do with writing . . .
Our characters shouldn't fit a mold either. We are free to mix things up, to build characters by pulling some behaviors and traits from Column A, some from Column B, and others from thin air. I mentioned some good examples of 3-D characters in my recent post on Sara Zarr's SWEETHEARTS. I'll also mention another recent read, Diane Les Becquets's SEASON OF ICE--not only because the female MC races cars on ice and is probably a character you haven't seen much before--but also because this story of a girl's search for the truth about her father is so compelling.
So, if I can choose a pink flower to decorate my blog, and like to watch football, and adore dark chocolate, and like to hike, and hate to wear makeup, and love reading about Himalayan mountaineering, and excel in science and math, and enjoy dressing up like a princess on my wedding day, and also rejoice in the fact that I never have to dress up like a princess again, then I think my characters can have multiple facets too. I just need to keep reminding myself of that truth.
I am not a girly girl; I'm not stereotypically feminine. I don't think of shopping as recreation, I don't scream when I see a spider, and I never ask my husband if this dress makes me look fat (I don't wear dresses anyway, unless absolutely forced to). Sometimes stereotypes are thrown in our faces so repeatedly, it's easy to forget that there are huge numbers of people to whom they don't apply--even when we ourselves don't fit the mold. How else would I, of all people, have bought into the mindset that "women love to shoe shop" so I must just be some kind of aberrant freak?
And now, watch this deft transition as I explain what the heck my shopping habits (or lack thereof) have to do with writing . . .
Our characters shouldn't fit a mold either. We are free to mix things up, to build characters by pulling some behaviors and traits from Column A, some from Column B, and others from thin air. I mentioned some good examples of 3-D characters in my recent post on Sara Zarr's SWEETHEARTS. I'll also mention another recent read, Diane Les Becquets's SEASON OF ICE--not only because the female MC races cars on ice and is probably a character you haven't seen much before--but also because this story of a girl's search for the truth about her father is so compelling.
So, if I can choose a pink flower to decorate my blog, and like to watch football, and adore dark chocolate, and like to hike, and hate to wear makeup, and love reading about Himalayan mountaineering, and excel in science and math, and enjoy dressing up like a princess on my wedding day, and also rejoice in the fact that I never have to dress up like a princess again, then I think my characters can have multiple facets too. I just need to keep reminding myself of that truth.
