Home
fallhike, winterhike, harebell, springhike, flower, capemeareslthouse

May 2008

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Page Summary

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Feb. 2nd, 2008

fallhike, winterhike, harebell, springhike, flower, capemeareslthouse

Description

First, because I always love a book giveaway, I'll let you know that Kate Messner's "pre-owned" ARC of Linda Sue Park's KEEPING SCORE is up for grabs.  Follow the link for details.  Now for our regularly scheduled programming:

I'm thinking about description today, since that will be the focus of my next editorial pass through my WIP.  The current pass is focused on plot and pacing.  During this pass, I've decided that my pacing is much better, but I could use more description.  This has always been a weakness of mine.  I'm something of a minimalist; if you liken my writing to visual arts, my stories would be more like sketches than photorealist paintings.  I like to put in the details that matter, the few and telling details, and let the reader use those clues to fill in the rest. Only sometimes, especially in early drafts, I tend to skimp too much.  While I do cut when I edit, I'm one of those writers who has to add more than cut during revision.

It's not that I don't admire the deep, lush, rich descriptive passages that many writers do so well.  I've mentioned Updike's THE CENTAUR a few times before, and since I've just reread it, this example is uppermost in my mind.  Updike's descriptive passages are not just evocative of setting; they relate to plot and theme as well; they include symbolism and help with characterization.  And boy, are they beautiful (even when what he's describing is not beautiful).  I admire them; I just can't write that way myself.

Of course, description can be done badly, too.  There are books in which chunks of description are just plopped right into the text, bringing the narrative flow to a standstill.  As a reader, I tend to skim or skip when I hit those snags.  That may have led to my disenchantment with long, detailed descriptions.

So here are my best thoughts on description:
Description should not only be evocative; it should matter somehow to the characterization, theme, or plot.
Details should be relevant.  Only tell the reader what s/he really needs to know.
Only tell the interesting parts: the quirky, or funny, or chilling, or repugnant.  Whatever it is, it should be fascinating.
Don't rely on stereotypes.  Tell it the way it is, not the way everyone thinks it's usually supposed to be.
Appeal to all five senses.
Read poetry for great examples of how words can be used for maximum effectiveness and depth.  Pay attention to the sounds of words as well as the meanings.
Allow the reader room for imagination. 

That's what I aspire to, anyway.