Log in


February 2017

Powered by LiveJournal.com

Criticism and praise

Tabitha at Writer Musings led me to this article on "Tough Love" for writers.

And as usual with most writing advice, I agree in part and disagree in part. I do think that most of us overestimate the quality of our work when we first start out. I do think that rigorous revising is important, and that most writers have no idea when they embark upon a project just how much editing it will need. I've also found that it's often difficult for us to critique our own work at the level it needs.

But maybe all that is nature's way of protecting us, of keeping us from curling up in the fetal position and giving up before we even begin.

I've always needed that confidence--even if it qualifies as overconfidence--to write anything in the first place. The first draft is all about mental cheerleading for me.

And then I let the inner critic out of the trunk where he hides out during drafting, and unleash him on my manuscript. And later still, I invite other critiquers in. Not with the ego-shattering force that the article describes, but with a willingness to delete anything that doesn't belong. I don't need people to come down on me "like a ton of bricks," "[tear] my stories to shreds and [throw] them back at me ... shatter[ing] my ego ..." The fact is, it's not about my ego at all. It's about the story. What makes it a better story? Where is the plot unbelievable or slow? Which scenes are contributing nothing? It's not personal. My book is not me.

I do sometimes get upset over criticism, but that's mostly because it means I have a lot more work to do, and sometimes I don't see right away how on earth I'm going to fix everything. Critique is not a judgment of me; it's a to-do list. And whining over to-do lists is part of my process--not the most glamorous part, to be sure, but the part that clears out the sludge of my resistance so the words can flow again. Look, it's not fun to rewrite seven chapters that you thought you were done with, or switch the whole thing to a different POV, or cut the book in half and rewrite the ending. It's much more fun to hear that you're a literary genius and you don't have to rewrite a word.

But praise is no good unless it's true, and praise alone doesn't help most writers grow. Rejecting all criticism usually doesn't help much either. On that, I agree with the article.

I suppose where I come down in the end is that we need a balance of praise and criticism to keep us going and keep us writing well. That mix varies from writer to writer and even from day to day. Whatever works.


I agree: both praise and criticism are necessary, and preferably criticism only when you've asked for it. :)

Part of my development as a writer came from the crucible of graduate-level writing workshops. I left the first one in tears but soon learned that it was exactly the sort of advice I needed if I were going to improve.
The medicine often tastes bad, but if it cures then we tend to accept it. :-)
It is about making the story better, and showing me where I went astray. It's not about tearing my story to pieces so that I no longer feel up to revising them. Constructive criticism is helpful even if it's not what I want to hear. Brutal comments only undermine my confidence. It's not that someone doesn't like what I've done so much as how they phrase their criticism, I think.
Shining a flashlight rather than torching the place!
Completely agree with the notion of a critique as a 'to-do list' - spot on! Love me a list, because it means I get the satisfaction of crossing things off it!
Lists make life feel more manageable ...
They most certainly do :O)